Seeing as you're the expert here can you provide some links where people
are using WireGuard to run a HA cluster in Docker without using Swarm? Like
I said, I'm not a WG expert but I'm always happy to be enlightened :)

On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 1:33 PM kekronbekron <
000002dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> I didn't misunderstand. It's a bit alarming that you'd say something is
> hacky without knowing anything about it... just because it's something new
> to you vs something you're familiar with.
> In your perspective, using wg for docker connectivity is hacky. I don't
> suppose you looked up how many people combine these two.
> There's a tinge of something being right because you're doing it that way,
> but I may be wrong though.
> I'm a fan of Swarm too, especially suggesting its consideration before
> thinking about kubernetes.
>
>
> On Thursday, November 9th, 2023 at 10:29, David Crayford <
> dcrayf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > You misunderstood my point. I'm not bashing WireGuard. I'm sure it's a
> > brilliant product and all power to them. My point is that using it to
> hack
> > a clustering solution seems a bit odd if you have Docker Swarm to create
> a
> > multi-host network using the overlay protocol. I know nothing about WG,
> but
> > I use Docker every day.
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 10:51 AM kekronbekron <
> > 000002dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > > ... instead of hacking together solutions that don’t work?
> > >
> > > Say that with a straight face to the companies building or relying on
> > > WireGuard and see what happens.
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, November 8th, 2023 at 19:30, David Crayford <
> > > dcrayf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > On 8 Nov 2023, at 9:36 pm, Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Dave Jousma wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Timothy. Yep found all that, have the instance up and
> working
> > > > > > just fine
> > > > >
> > > > > > it’s the peer to peer networking that is not working. The fine
> folks
> > > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > > > Rocket indicate that their software is picking up the internal
> > > > > > container IP,
> > > > >
> > > > > > and not using the Host IP causing the problem. They are working
> up
> > > > > > their own
> > > > >
> > > > > > testing, and believe that docker overlay networking can resolve
> this.
> > > > >
> > > > > OK, it’s interesting the software works that way.
> > > >
> > > > What software are you referring to, Docker? That’s fundamental to how
> > > > Docker networking works. Publishing ports using “-p <portnum>”
> doesn’t make
> > > > the services discoverable in docker containers. You meed overlay
> > > > networking. TE Web is a typical clustering architecture using
> > > > active/passive HA. You will also find that you can not run curl from
> within
> > > > a Docker image. Most docker containers are built to take up as small
> a
> > > > footprint as necessary so utilities like curl are not installed and
> you
> > > > cannot instal them using apt if security keys are not enabled, which
> is
> > > > best practice.
> > > >
> > > > > (“Thinking out loud...”) Could you run a “bigger” Linux container
> > > > > image that includes a VPN tunnel (such as WireGuard) to connect
> these two
> > > > > peers with one another to work around the issue?
> > > >
> > > > Why not just use a Docker clustering such as swarm instead of hacking
> > > > together solutions that don’t work?
> > > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
> IBM-MAIN
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to