$40-$45 for a VTAM/TCP-IP/Network specialist with MVS, CICS, DB2, and MQ skills thrown in.

Doug Fuerst



------ Original Message ------
From "Bob Bridges" <robhbrid...@gmail.com>
To IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date 12/2/2023 22:43:20 PM
Subject Re: Assembler programmer wanted

Hey, I didn't say we don't ~want~ better rates.  I didn't even say we don't deserve them 
(though I might if pressed.  I don't use the word "deserve" casually).  I said 
only that we don't need them - and added that I was speaking strictly for myself 😀.

When I was an employee I'd been at the same company for 14 years.  Inevitably I was 
underpaid, and I say that not as an indictment of my employer, it's just what happens 
when you stay at the same place that long.  I've been contracting since then and the 
money is much better out here.  Like a convenience store, the buyers have to pay more for 
convenience - in the case of computer contracting, that would be the ability to send me 
home for any reason or no reason ("we decided not to do that project after 
all").  But they have to pay extra cash for it.  Even after paying my own travel 
expenses, and even counting the often-long periods between gigs, I was still better off 
financially when I started contracting.

$45/hr?  If you're talking about COBOL developers, hasn't the price risen on 
them in the last ten years, due to increasing scarcity and no decrease in the 
need?  I'm not in that market any longer (I do RACF/ACF2/TSS), but it seems to 
me I've been seeing $50/hr and up for them.

---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313

/* I have a page bookmarked somewhere — but I can't find it just at the moment — in which 
a guy fills the screen with details about his [World of Warcraft] characters, what level 
they are, what they're doing, where they're doing it, what they plan to do next, and 
ending "And now you know how I feel when you talk about sports."  -Dorothy J. 
Heydt */

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
Doug Fuerst
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 18:36

Let me get this right: Companies will pay their lawyers $750 an hour and up, 
but the people that write the code to keep their businesses running, that do 
the support work to keep those businesses running, us they want to pay $45 an 
hour for, and give us a list of skills they want a mile long.

I said this facetiously originally, but what I just said is unfortunately the 
truth. You all took it seriously, so there it is.  Seriously.

Lately, the numbers are back to pre-Covid.  Thankfully, I don't have much time 
left in this business.  By that time, ChatGPT will be fixing it all. I'll be on 
the golf course.  So far, ChatGPT can't swing a golf club.

------ Original Message ------
From "Bob Bridges" <robhbrid...@gmail.com>
Date 12/2/2023 16:51:46

Again, I'm speaking only for myself, but I definitely think we DON'T "need" 
better terms.  I have a great job that pays me more money than I spend for doing what I 
wanted to do anyway.

(Not that I'd insist on giving back some of it if folks insist on
offering more.  But I don't want to ride the edge of client resentment.
If they're gritting their teeth and thinking "Boy, he'd better be worth
it!" the day I come aboard, I'm already behind.  Better they should
feel superior at having gotten me for less than they were willing to
pay.)

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On
Behalf Of Doug Fuerst
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 16:37

We need a better union. Maybe Fran Drescher is available. Actors have better 
terms. Former Nanny's apparently can get them.

We need better terms.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to