Here’s the problem. When you “secure” the mainframe with LESS SECURE platforms, you actually open yourself up to hacks. Splunk has been hacked quite frequently.
https://www.securityweek.com/high-severity-vulnerability-patched-in-splunk-enterprise/amp/ Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Thursday, March 7, 2024, 11:07 AM, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote: Well sure, over-reliance on any one "solution" as a panacea is foolish. I had prospects tell me "we don't have any security issues -- we have RACF." CM On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 02:08:26 +0000, kekronbekron <kekronbek...@protonmail.com> wrote: >> You are making a mistake if you discount the effectiveness of >> industry-standard tools in analyzing mainframe data. > >Let me clarify... I'm not saying don't use it at all. Just saying that there >seems to be a tendency to lean too heavily on it, after it has gotten its foot >through the door (for receiving security events). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
