The number at the end isn't a statement number. I created the error with a job 
with only 9 cards. But I can't find documentation of what, exactly, it is.

It kind of looks like a sequence number that is increasing for every system 
message on the LPAR, for the purpose of associating messages that are multiple 
lines.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Steve Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 9:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IBM-MAIN] IEFC452I !?!

Love your sense of humor.


On 4/22/2025 9:22 PM, Tabor, Richard J wrote:
> With all my years of experience, I was finally able to get a job to fail with 
> a JCL error (after 7 tries) - my last JCL error occurred in the late 80's.
>
> M 4040000 FUP7     25112 17:57:34.54 JOB01117 00000090  IEFC452I JCERRJCE - 
> JOB NOT RUN - JCL ERROR 384
> ...
> M 4008000 FUP7     25112 17:58:34.59 STC10966 00000080  AOF568I 17:58:34 : 
> STATUS OF NTVF7 OUTBOUND GATEWAY TO DOMAIN 386
> E                                         386 00000080   ING01 IS INACTIVE - 
> TARGET DOMAIN ING01 IS NOT ACTIVE
> M 4008000 FUP7     25112 17:58:34.61 STC10966 00000080  AOF568I 17:58:34 : 
> STATUS OF NTVF7 OUTBOUND GATEWAY TO DOMAIN 387
> E                                         387 00000080   ING02 IS INACTIVE - 
> TARGET DOMAIN ING02 IS NOT ACTIVE
> M 4008000 FUP7     25112 17:58:34.62 STC10966 00000080  AOF568I 17:58:34 : 
> STATUS OF NTVF7 OUTBOUND GATEWAY TO DOMAIN 388
> E                                         388 00000080   ING03 IS INACTIVE - 
> TARGET DOMAIN ING03 IS NOT ACTIVE
>
> I'm guessing that mysterious number all the way to the right has nothing to 
> do with the number of JCL statements.
>
> I would love to show you the JCL I used to produce this, but I would have to 
> eliminate everyone on this list.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
> Steve Thompson
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 2:26 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IBM-MAIN] IEFC452I !?!
>
> **** External Email - Use Caution ****
>
> Thank you.
>
> I forgot to mention that I did run this with TYPRUN=SCAN and get the same 
> message.
>
> And to be sure, I have been running this JOB off an for the past month.
>
> I have gotten file not found. That was the first thing I checked, using "F 
> FOUND" and that typically shows me the missing DSN.
>
> Not on/with this failure.
>
> And submitting it again -- the suffixing number of the error is different, 
> and is greater than the number of JCL statements in this JOB. So that doesn't 
> seem related.
>
> Regards,
> Steve Thompson
>
>
>
> On 4/22/2025 5:01 PM, Ramsey Hallman wrote:
>> The version prior to 3.1 is 2.5 of z/OS.
>>
>> >From the error message, it does not necessarily have to be the job
>>> name. It
>> could be other JCL issues.
>>
>>     IEFC452I text - JOB NOT RUN - JCL ERROR
>>
>>      Explanation
>>
>>      Depending on the message text, one of the following:
>>
>>      JOBFAIL
>>
>>         The error was detected on a JOB statement and the job name is not
>>          known.
>>
>>      INVALID
>>          The system detected an error in a JOB or other JCL statement, and
>>          the job name (the label on the JOB statement) is invalid.
>>
>>      jobname
>>          The system detected an error in a JCL statement, or the job was
>>          cancelled while on the input queue.
>>
>>      procstep
>>          The procedure was specified in the first operand of a START command.
>>          In this case, either the procedure was not found in SYS1.PROCLIB or,
>>          if found, the procedure had an error in a JCL statement. Message
>>          IEE122I or IEE132I will always follow this message.
>>
>>      The error message appears in the SYSOUT data set.
>>
>>      This message can also be issued for various environmental errors,
>>      such as an error occurring while trying to read a record from the
>>      JCL text data set or an I/O error occurring while trying to get
>>      procedure statements.
>>
>>      System action
>>
>>      If the operator cancelled the job, all steps of the job, beginning
>>      with the step currently being processed, will be ended. Otherwise,
>>      the job will not be initiated; no steps will be processed. If
>>      procstep appears, the START command will not be run.
>>
>>      Operator response
>>
>>      If the job name appears, none. If procstep appears, either reenter
>>      the START command with the correct procedure name, or, if the
>>      procedure name is correct, notify the application programmer.
>>
>>      Programmer response
>>
>>      Check the procedure for errors.
>>
>>      Source
>>
>>      Converter
>>
>>      Module
>>
>>      IEFCNJRT
>>
>>      Routing code
>>
>>      2,10
>>
>>      Descriptor code
>>
>>      4
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 3:53 PM Steve Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all, got a weird one.
>>>
>>> I am running the same JOB over and over processing different files.
>>> All that changes is the suffix on an output DSN that identifies the
>>> DATA cycle of this execution, and the SORTIN DD/DSN contents (some
>>> have a single file some have up to 15 files). Data may be on disk or
>>> tape. TPM holds the job until HSM restore completes if that is why
>>> the data is on tape.
>>>
>>> I would love to show you the JCL, but I am NOT allowed. Suffice to
>>> say security controls.
>>>
>>> I have taken the JOB cards off another one of these JOBs that ran
>>> successfully and replaced the JOB card (one from a prior submission
>>> of this specific JOB).
>>>
>>> And I still get this error. The last thing it says is 748.
>>> Since I don't have 700 JCL statements, that isn't the problem.
>>> Besides this is supposedly a JOB card error!!
>>>
>>> BTW, sometimes the files I have been told to pick disappear before I
>>> can get the JCL updated and submitted, so I do get file not found
>>> errors. But this is not the issue here.
>>>
>>> I have a copy of the full tech library for the Version of z/OS just
>>> prior to 3.1 (can't remember the V/R). And it is not helping me with
>>> this.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks for your help/insight in advance.
>>>
>>> Steve Thompson

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to