On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:57:31 +0100, R.S. <r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl> wrote:
>Well, AIM3 (and AIM at all) was introduced in OS/390 2.10 AFAIR, approx >13 years ago. >It's much more time, than BPX.UNIQUE.USER - it was new feature in z/OS >1.11 and have-to-be-done in 1.13. Big difference. Yes, I recall trying to get my client to go to AIM 3 sometime around 2003, but it had the same restriction then with shared UIDs and they didn't want to do the remediation. >BTW: IMHO *both* changes (AIM and UNIQUE.USER) are relatively simple to >perform, but that's another story. Yes, assuming you don't have the remediation issue my client has. I haven't looked at the doc in a while, but I think the AIM migration suggests IPLs between certain steps or there could be problems with the unix mapping. That will be a big problem for my client and defeats the purpose of 24 x 7 parallel sysplex application availability since the RACF DB is a single shared resource. Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:m...@mzelden.com ITIL v3 Foundation Certified Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://search390.techtarget.com/ateExperts/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
