> 6 extents times 10 tracks is only 60 tracks but you say it's 157 tracks.
Not me! ISPF 3.4 says it's 157 tracks. <g> Some of the jobs must have gone to secondary allocation. No, there is no other job involved. I made up the dataset name and changed the one PROC from DUMMY to the name I made up. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jon Perryman Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 7:15 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMF DUMP SB37 - what am I doing wrong? 6 extents times 10 tracks is only 60 tracks but you say it's 157 tracks. There must be another job that is also adding to this dataset. I suspect there is more than just the TYPE(89) records in this dataset. Jon Perryman. ----- Original Message ----- > From: Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> > > //DUMPOUT DD DSN=xxxxxx.SMFDATA,DISP=(MOD,CATLG), > // SPACE=(TRK,(10,10),RLSE), // LRECL=32760,RECFM=VBS > > There is almost nothing going on on the system. I have only a very few > Type > 89 records: > 89 8 .07 % 1,794.00 326 > > But xxxxxx.SMFDATA quickly goes to multiple extents, multiple tracks, > and an SB37. Here is about 24 hours' worth of data: > Tracks %Used XT > xxxxxx.SMFDATA 157 100 6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
