On 2013-12-28, at 10:21, Charles Mills wrote:

> The user-friendly interactive nature of CMS. 
>  
How would you rank CMS vis-a-vis Unix System Services by
this criterion?  Before USS was available I tended to edit
JCL on CMS with XEDIT; nowadays on Solaris, often accessing
legacy data sets with NFS.  NFS will deal with PDSE; I
suspect that CMS would have trouble ACCESSing a PDSE, and
writing to any legacy z/OS data set from CMS is questionable,
as is catalog search.  I use TSO/ISPF, now as earlier,
largely for:

o SDSF
o DSLIST
o DDLIST
o Testing with a customer-like environment.

I keep one ISPF session active, and as many USS or Solaris
as convenient; I've never mastered WSA.

(and I have one EXEC that uses ISPF LMGET to process
RECFM=U (by override) data sets because EXECIO refuses
to deal with U.  That's reported to get better in 2.1.)

Rexx SYSCALL is a boon (or a least it spares me learning
Perl).

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to