I have my own edit system:
Use Vim to do editing and sytax highligting, auto complete, also Vim
calls ftp command and one shell to submit JCL that do send to z/OS and
call compiler.
Also intergrate with Cygwin can use a lot of GNU utility, such as
grep/awk/sed. I think the most powerful thing is grep and Vim.
The most inconvience is COBOL enterprise compiler's result is not match
real source line number, because it calculates copybook and sql statement.
I tried many solutions to solve this problem but not stable and graceful.
And use CICS explorer to debug. Because security issue, we don't have
NFS enabled, but maybe in the future I can use Vim edit NFS file directly.
δΊ 2013/12/30 3:15, Paul Gilmartin ει:
On 2013-12-28, at 10:21, Charles Mills wrote:
The user-friendly interactive nature of CMS.
How would you rank CMS vis-a-vis Unix System Services by
this criterion? Before USS was available I tended to edit
JCL on CMS with XEDIT; nowadays on Solaris, often accessing
legacy data sets with NFS. NFS will deal with PDSE; I
suspect that CMS would have trouble ACCESSing a PDSE, and
writing to any legacy z/OS data set from CMS is questionable,
as is catalog search. I use TSO/ISPF, now as earlier,
largely for:
o SDSF
o DSLIST
o DDLIST
o Testing with a customer-like environment.
I keep one ISPF session active, and as many USS or Solaris
as convenient; I've never mastered WSA.
(and I have one EXEC that uses ISPF LMGET to process
RECFM=U (by override) data sets because EXECIO refuses
to deal with U. That's reported to get better in 2.1.)
Rexx SYSCALL is a boon (or a least it spares me learning
Perl).
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
