> Why? It seems correctly worded to me. >>:>>+ 12,SETFRR A CANNOT BE ISSUED IN AMODE 64 PRIOR TO Z/OS 1.8 >>:>>OR IN AR ASC MODE. PLEASE CHANGE TO BE IN AMODE 31 OR PRIMARY >>:>>ASC MODE FOR THE INVOCATION AND INDICATE YOUR RELEASE, >>:>>AMODE, AND ASC MODE VIA SYSSTATE
> It says, as I read it, that SETFRR cannot be issued in AMODE64 > either (a) prior to z/OS 1.8 or (b) in AR ASC mode. And that seems > to match reality (and will match the book when Peter gets the book > updated). It could also be read as saying that it cannot be issued (a) in AMODE 64, prior to z/OS 1.8, or (b) in AR ASC Mode. That was how I read the message. Your interpretation, which does match reality, did not occur to me at all, and I'm guessing that Binyamin saw it the same way -- hence his suggestion to reword. Regards, Allen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
