Charles Mills wrote: >Does COBOL 5.1 have a "show me the pseudo-assembler listing" option? That >would provide a better test IMHO.
Thanks. I forgot about that one. >-- but all pretty modest effects IMHO. Or am I missing something? No, you are 100% correct. Hmm, now I'm thinking about it, I'm now curious. If your object code is made shorter by optimizing, the type of Jump or Branch could be changed. Something in the sense of 'near' jump are used instead of 'far' jump. True? False? If true, is this also modest? Disclaimer: I wish I have COBOL 5.1, but I'll have to wait ... ;) Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
