Thanks. Digressing ... any idea of the WHY for this restriction? Charles
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2014 2:14 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: AW: Re: JCLLIB in started proc? >> If that requires the resolution of JCL procedures or JCL INCLUDEs, >> the only source for this is the "procedure library" of the subsystem. > > So you are saying that JCLLIB is never accepted in a started PROC? No, I didn't mean to imply that. I just leaft out JCLLIB inadvertently. This statement should read: If that requires the resolution of JCL procedures or JCL INCLUDEs, the only source for this is the "procedure library" of the subsystem, and any JCLLIB library which may be present in the JCL *if* the JCL was the result of step 1a) or 2a). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
