On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:04:59 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > >>IBM doesn't seem interested in going much beyond >>POSIX requirements; sometimes not even that far. > >Hence the need to submit a requirement if you have a business need. >There's no guaranty that IBM will accept it, but they certainly won't >accept it if it's never submitted. > This is largely academic for me -- I have better platforms than ISPF for regex processing. But what I'd find most important is an accommodation for regexen in Edit macros that's portable among subject code pages. It would be an unsatisfactory approach to say that a macro must first be translated to the subject code page to be used; better to require that macros be in a uniform DBCS Unicode page and accommodate editing text in an arbitrary subject code page.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
