Good point! The software costs might break the deal. Use that to send those developers back to drawing board.

Roger

On 4/8/2015 5:11 PM, J O Skip Robinson wrote:
I have not mined this thread meticulously, but I did not see mention of 
software costs. If you upgrade your CEC, the ISV (V for vulture) folks will 
descend upon you as in the Hitchcock movie and peck your corpse clean to the 
bone. IBM will be there too with beak in motion.

The software costs of a hardware upgrade can be stunning, especially if the 
bean counters budgeted only the hardware portion. Those additional costs live 
on forever because the annual maintenance fees go up as well.

Which is to say that no matter how cheaply memory or storage can be obtained, 
the cost of additional MIPS looms larger than it appears in the mirror.

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Roger W. Suhr (GMail)
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 2:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: A New Perfromance Model ?

I think this nailed it!  Clueless is also correct.  It did start back in the 90's with 
"disk space is cheap", then it went to "memory is cheap'
and now it's MIPS is a commodity, so is the manpower to maintain all that stuff.
It's all in the CLOUD now anyway - who cares!

Roger

On 4/8/2015 4:11 PM, Dave Barry wrote:
In the old paradigm, technology was managed by technologists.  In the new 
paradigm, technology is managed by accountants.  Computer hardware and labor 
costs wind up on different lines of the general ledger.  They have different 
budgetary constraints and are treated differently for tax purposes depending on 
whether they are capitalized or expensed.

I've heard the new regime refer to MIPS as a commodity.  Talk about clueless...!

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of esst...@juno.com
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2015 4:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: A New Perfromance Model ?

.
Can someone explain and rationalize for this new paradyne ?
.
"cheaper to Upgrade the mainfame than to have the application programmers review 
their code for performance oppurtunities".

.
Im clueless .  ??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to