I have raised a RFE as suggested that AMATERSE validate a PACK option so that it will not fail on an UNPACK. Please review it and if you agree vote for it.
(Of course I would not object if they changed AMATERSE so that a PACK of a PDSE containing Program Objects can be UNPACKed as a solution) Link I have been given is http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=69338 regards, Anthony Fletcher From: Timothy Sipples/Singapore/IBM@IBMSG To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 09/04/2015 19:13 Subject: Re: AMATERSE and PDSE ? Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> There have been a couple interesting (to me at least) suggestions to improve TERSE. As a gentle reminder, please spend just a few minutes entering your suggestions into IBM RFE: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe You may not get the improvements you'd like unless you ask, and that's the way to ask IBM. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Timothy Sipples IT Architect Executive, Industry Solutions, IBM z Systems, AP/GCG/MEA E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
