It's really TSO that does not, no? If I could just sign onto TSO multiple times then my desktop with its two 24" monitors would give me all the multiple sessions I could use.
And I suppose one could argue semantics here. One could argue both ISPF and the 3290 support "split screen." Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 8:06 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question on 3270 Devices On 2015-05-30, at 18:36, J O Skip Robinson wrote: > Sounds a lot like 3290, which was very much an IBM device. Had a large gas panel display with orange on black. (Netflix anyone?) Configurable in various ways as you describe. > . An example of how IBM hardware design outpaces its software design. A couple decades after an IBM terminal supported multiple sessions, ISPF doesn't support a user's having multiple sessions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN