You've devolved into babbling. Zman out. On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) < shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net> wrote:
> In > <cafo-8tohfcwkbrfe0b8amdghk_5tvlubgm0o_vlfrjo25yv...@mail.gmail.com>, > on 06/07/2015 > at 10:33 PM, zMan <zedgarhoo...@gmail.com> said: > > >OK, what I wrote was: > >...could either support four 3279 sessions at once, or one 3279 > >session that took the whole screen (you could switch modes; in > >single-session mode, you'd then cycle through the sessions). > > >Which is admittedly not 100% clear, > > Not even close. > > >but doesn't make sense as "can only display one session at a > >time", because then there wouldn't be a single-session mode, eh? > > I'd say that it doesn't make sense the other way: "Where have all the > pixels gone, long time passing?" Then there's the question of explicit > partitions, which were crucial to the 3290's appeal. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> > We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. > (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
