Caveat: with daily digesting, I'm at least a day behind the discussion... Actually, I believe that MXG is SMFxxDTE & SMFxxTME cognizant by virtue of using the underlying SAS 'inFormat's SMFDATETIME, SMFDATE, & SMFTIME. I do my SMF reporting using SAS directly and, using SMFDATETIME, get SAS Date/DateTime variables [1] that can have the (out) 'Format's you desire.
[1] If I remember rightly, the SAS internal representations are #seconds or days from an arbitrary point ie. Jan 01, 1970 (or 1900?). That means, internally, the raw value can be negative for dates/times in previous (Gregorian) centuries, etc. --------> signature = 8 lines follows <-------- Neil Duffee, Joe Sysprog, uOttawa, Ottawa, Ont, Canada telephone:1 613 562 5800 x4585 fax:1 613 562 5161 mailto:NDuffee of uOttawa.ca http:/ /aix1.uOttawa.ca/ ~nduffee “How *do* you plan for something like that?” Guardian Bob, Reboot “For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism.” “Systems Programming: Guilty, until proven innocent” John Norgauer 2004 "Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a restore is attempted." John McKown 2015 -----Original Message----- From: Charles Mills [mailto:cha...@mcn...org] Sent: January 5, 2016 19:46 Subject: Re: SMFxTME field Of course, if you have the good Doctor Merrill's most excellent MXG software then it will do all of this for you and more in but a trice! -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 4:30 PM Subject: Re: SMFxTME field The SMFxxTME and SMFxxDTE fields are in my experience consistent representations of *local* time and date on the LPAR represented by the SMFID. No worries about leap seconds (unless you need to get back to some more basic time than local). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
