On 15 March 2016 at 12:46, Lindy Mayfield <lindy.mayfi...@sas.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for the new stuff I learned by asking a mixed up question. But I > got it now. And just to be completely clear on the original message IKJ56236I FILE STEPLIB INVALID, FILENAME RESTRICTED This really does mean just what it says. It's the four DDNAMEs JOBLIB, STEPLIB, JOBCAT, and STEPCAT themselves that are caught and rejected early on in dynamic allocation. It's not some more subtle "effective STEPLIB" or something; it's those exact DDNAMEs. Of course everyone remembers that FILENAME (and in some contexts FILE) is early TSO-speak for DDNAME... But this leads to a particularly confusing version of the message: alloc ddname(steplib) path('/usr/bin') IKJ56236I PATH /usr/bin INVALID, FILENAME RESTRICTED which is still complaining about STEPLIB, not '/usr/bin'. This surely calls for one of Gil's well formulated SRs. IBM has changed some of the sillier TSO messages over the years, so it's not that there's no hope at all. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN