>You provided analysis of some data. If you had provided the data that you used >to arrive at the conclusions >that you did, that would have been helpful. It >may have led to a request for more data, but at least we would >have had a >place to start.
You're right. Would have been better to post snippets from the dump in addition to my conclusions and questions. >You've shown the PSW. You haven't shown the data at and before the PSW. Do you >have the ILC? I did not show the data but I wrote that the PSW NSI points to a bunch of x'00'. Sorry this was not clear enough. And I dd not post the ILC because I considered it irrelevant. With a 0C4-11 the NSI points to the failing isntruction itself and this was x'0000'. But I admit, this was again subjective information instead of facts. -- Peter Hunkeler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
