On 2016-08-04 15:48, Hardee, Chuck wrote: > That would definitely work Peter, but ultimately I will not be the one > compiling the program for production. > I am developing a system level service routine that will be used by the > application programmers but when it goes into production it will be a > production control person that will be compiling it. > > I guess I'll have to bite the bullet and modify the compile panels to support > additional parms. > Any process that requires the programmer to remember to make an idiosyncratic options entry for one or a few targets will be error-prone.
Rather, I would do this with a Makefile with explicit recipes for those few targets that need peculiar options, and a default suffix rule for everything else. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
