I tried that and it failed because when you use export/import, catalog code 
expects you to import using the same name and the same volume so unless you can 
use the same volser and the same catalog name this will not work.

--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 9/15/16, Gibney, Dave <gib...@wsu.edu> wrote:

 Subject: Re: REASON: 3 - RECORD TYPE NOT RECOGNIZED
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Received: Thursday, September 15, 2016, 3:25 PM
 
 Well, try to IMPORT the
 back-up on a test system or different name and see what
 happens.
 
 > -----Original
 Message-----
 > From: IBM Mainframe
 Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 > On Behalf Of willie bunter
 > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 10:07
 AM
 > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 > Subject: Re: REASON: 3 - RECORD TYPE NOT
 RECOGNIZED
 > 
 > I was
 told that EXPORT/IMPORT would not fix the problem because it
 would
 > export the bad records only REPOR
 MERGECAT would work.
 > 
 > I ran a LISTCAT on the dataset (as flagged
 by the DIAGNOSE) and it came
 > clean. 
 This leads me to believe that it may not be the offending
 dsn.  The dsn
 > is on the volumes (3)
 > 
 > The catalog is
 backed up via IDCAMS EXPORT daily successfully.
 > 
 > I plan to run a
 VERIFY/EXAMINE (as recommended) and see what comes out.
 > 
 >
 --------------------------------------------
 > On Wed, 9/14/16, retired mainframer <retired-mainfra...@q.com>
 > wrote:
 > 
 >  Subject: Re: REASON: 3 - RECORD TYPE NOT
 RECOGNIZED
 >  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 >  Received: Wednesday, September 14, 2016,
 12:37 PM
 > 
 >  REPRO
 MERGECAT does not
 >  seem like the best
 choice to me.  It might work for a user  catalog since
 the
 > DSN is not needed by users to
 access their  datasets.  For every level that is
 > moved, you need to  change the alias in
 the master to relate to the new DSN.
 >
 (This is what the warning is about.)  What will REPRO do 
 when it encounters
 > the bad record?
 > 
 >  It's been a
 while but I seem to remember  using EXPORT followed by
 IMPORT
 > for issues like this. 
 Don't forget to lock the catalog for the job's
 > duration.  (You may need to do this
 during scheduled down  time without
 >
 users accessing the catalog.)
 > 
 >  What happens if you try to
 >  access the dataset by way of the
 catalog, such as specifying  it on a DD
 > statement?   Have you tried to 
 manually delete and recreate the offending
 > catalog entry?  Is the dataset physically
 on the volume the catalog thinks  it's
 > on?
 > 
 >  From where
 >  would
 you restore the catalog?  How was it backed up?  If  by
 DFDSS, was it a
 > physical or logical
 backup?
 > 
 >  >
 -----Original Message-----
 >  > From:
 IBM Mainframe Discussion List
 > 
 [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 >  On
 >  > Behalf Of
 willie bunter
 >  > Sent: Wednesday,
 September 14, 2016 4:33  AM  > To: IBM-
 > m...@listserv.ua.edu 
 > Subject: Re: REASON: 3 - RECORD TYPE NOT
 > RECOGNIZED  >  > The  DIAGNOSE
 gives the same error and no change.  I ran
 > examine  (using the following  >
 parms) and "
 >  NO ERRORS
 DETECTED"
 >  >
 >  > INDEXTEST DATATEST
 >  >
 >  ITEST
 NODATATEST ERRORLIMIT(1000)
 >  >
 >  NOITEST DATATEST ERRORLIMIT(1000)
 >  >
 >  > I ran
 LISTCAT against the CATALOG and it  flagged the same VSAM
 dsn
 > posting the  >  following
 error messages:
 >  > IEC331I
 >  028-002,LISTCAT ,STEP1   ,IGG0CLEG
 >  > According to the problem
 explanation
 >  > Explanation: An I/O
 error processing
 >  the
 >  > catalog occurred while
 processing
 >  an access
 >  > method services command that
 >  requires
 >  >
 modifying the catalog.
 >  >
 Programmer Response: Messages IEC331I,  > IEC332I, and
 IEC333I have
 > been printed to  aid 
 > in determining the cause of the  error and  >
 where
 > the error occurred. If  a
 hardware error  > is not causing the  problem,
 > restore or  > rebuild the 
 catalog.
 >  >
 > 
 > I have
 >  read up on the process of
 rebuilding the catalog (REPRO
 > 
 MERGECAT) however
 >  > there could be
 a
 >  problem when using LEVEL or ENTRIES
 parm.  According to the  doc  > "may
 > cause data sets to no  longer be
 found".  This is not reassuring.
 >  >
 >  > I would
 prefer to
 >  restore the CATALOG which
 seems safer.  I would like  guidance on this  >
 > subject.
 > 
 > 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 >  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
 archive  access instructions,  send email
 > to lists...@listserv.ua.edu 
 with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 > 
 >
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
 access instructions, send email to
 > lists...@listserv.ua.edu
 with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
 access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
 with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to