In contrast, a compiler coded in its own language tends to be much
better, user friendly in features, than a compiler coded in any other language.
Interesting observation.
At 12/2/2016 09:11 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 17:41:25 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
>
>Why does IBM keep taking things that aren't broken (LookAt, Book Manager)
>and making them trendy, rather than keeping them in a form that is useful to
>their customers?
>
One can often tell when a product is produced and supported by people who
have no interest in using it.
And the worst such people are web developers.
In contrast, a compiler coded in its own language tends to be much better,
user friendly in features, than a compiler coded in any other language.
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Dave Cole
ColeSoft Marketing
414 Third Street, NE
Charlottesville, VA 22902
EADDRESS: <mailto:dbc...@colesoft.com>dbc...@colesoft.com
Home page: www.colesoft.com
LinkedIn: www.xdc.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/colesoftware
YouTube: www.youtube.com/user/colesoftware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
