On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:31:57 -0600, Greg Dyck <gregd...@pobox.com> wrote:
>On 1/19/2017 9:24 AM, Greg Dyck wrote: >> Many, many, moons ago type 2 SVCs were managed differently from type 4 >> SVCs. It's a fuzzy memory, but I believe they had to be 2K or less in >> size and were loaded from SVCLIB transiently into a common 2K area. That >> lead to restrictions for them that are still published but not actually >> valid. > >Sigh... I just realized I mixed up type 2 and type 3 SVCs... forget that >discussion. > >Again, SUSPEND is totally different service than Pause. The documented >restriction is for SUSPEND, and only for SUSPEND. As quoted by the OP, the restriction did not mention any particular macro. It said the caller of a type 2 SVC can't be suspended. Wouldn't a pause be a form of suspencion? -- Walt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
