Steve Smith wrote: >I don't understand IBM's insistence on "data set", which is a generic >phrase equivalent to "set of data". "Dataset" has been in use for decades >to mean a collection of records organized in particular ways and stored on >a computer system, particularly on our architecture.
I share your consternation. But at this point we're arguing against the tide (to mangle a metaphor). Might as well argue about what "USS" stands for! ...phsiii (standing back...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
