On 4/26/2017 7:22 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
While we're on this... I discourage people here from documenting things like "specify the name of a zFS file". Who knows how long zFS will be around? HFS seems to be effectively dead. Maybe in a couple of years a great new QFS or something will be the UNIX file system du jour on z/OS. One of our product's docs were full of "HFS" references from ten years ago, but had nothing to do with defining a new HFS or the like; they just meant UNIX file, as opposed to MVS dataset...
If only we in SMP/E had that kind of foresight (what, 20+ years ago?) we would not have used "HFS" as an element type. Of course this goes beyond documentation, so I suspect we'll be stuck with ++HFS for the foreseeable future.
Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
