On Mon, 15 May 2017 10:28:37 -0400, Steve Smith wrote: >RSAPF probably shouldn't even be documented. AFAIK, it's only purpose is >to allow the system to support unauthorized tasks and jobs, and is used >only with the creation of a new job-step task. And there is no >communication between the initiator task and the user task. > What does the TSO TMP use to accomplish this?
(Topic drift: What's the difference between INTRDR and TSOINRDR?) >Authorized programs aren't allowed to invoke unauthorized code for a very >good reason. Trying to circumvent that in any way compromises your system >integrity. That said, running bad authorized code does as well, so caveat >emptor. > A couple contributors have suggested fork(). A similar option is BPX1EXM. But all such facilities introduce complexities in communication between parent and child processes. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
