> In my opinion PDSE design wasn't and still isn't ready for prime time. > It couldn't and still can't handle SYS1.NUCLEUS and SYS1.LPALIB because it depends on a started task.
Kind of an arbitrary standard, isn't it? I could argue VSAM or DB2 are not ready for prime time because you can't use them for SYS1.NUCLEUS residence. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Clark Morris Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 8:52 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: PDSE design flaws and need for COBOL 4.2 was Re: Lack of Support for Doc for COBOL [Default] On 7 Sep 2017 22:56:50 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main sipp...@sg.ibm.com (Timothy Sipples) wrote: >IBM first introduced PDSEs about 27 years ago. IBM first introduced >Java on >OS/390 about 21 years ago. > >That's a long, long time ago. In my opinion PDSE design wasn't and still isn't ready for prime time. It couldn't and still can't handle SYS1.NUCLEUS and SYS1.LPALIB because it depends on a started task. While I would agree that SYS1.NUCLEUS could be ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
