I found this from a PMR I opened about 10 years ago asking about /etc or /var 
updates, the response from IBM then was and I believe still is fact; 



IBM will not via SMP/E apply place anything in either the /etc or 
/var directories, thus it is not necessary to mount them for the 
SMP/E apply portion of the maintenance upgrade process. 
If any updates are required they would be as hold actions in 
the applicable ptf's, and as such the /etc and /var hfs data sets 
can be mounted separately to facilitate the required updates. 
If you do require that the directories be changed back to real 
directories for another purpose, then SYS1.SAMPLIB member BPXISETD 
will convert the symbolic links back to real directories, and BPXISETS 
will convert the directories back to symbolic links. 

Carmen Vitullo 

----- Original Message -----

From: "David Jousma" <david.jou...@53.com> 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
Sent: Friday, February 9, 2018 1:17:26 PM 
Subject: Re: Best Practices for z/OS Maintenance 

Just did the LIST DDDEF. As suspected, there are no references in my V2.3 
target zones for anything /etc or /var or /Service/etc or /Service/var 

_________________________________________________________________ 
Dave Jousma 
Manager Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President 
david.jou...@53.com 
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB2H 
p 616.653.8429 
f 616.653.2717 


-----Original Message----- 
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Jesse 1 Robinson 
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 1:32 PM 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
Subject: Re: Best Practices for z/OS Maintenance 

**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** 

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails** 

I would like to investigate this issue here, but I don't know how to find a 
DDDEF that might point to the /etc or /var file system. As I said previously, 
our /etc and /var file systems in production are 'permanent' in that they are 
not updated by our maintenance migration. But I am concerned about the 
situation on the (only) system where we actually run SMPE. 

. 
. 
J.O.Skip Robinson 
Southern California Edison Company 
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 
323-715-0595 Mobile 
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW 
robin...@sce.com 


-----Original Message----- 
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Art Gutowski 
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 9:53 AM 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
Subject: (External):Re: Best Practices for z/OS Maintenance 

>We don't mount the IBM provided /etc /var file systems for actual use. We use 
>those to compare with what we have. 
>AFAIK, there is NOT any SMPE that updates those anyway, its just what 
>Serverpac provides. 
>I never mount those filesystems for SMPE maintenance and never get any errors. 

SMP/E LIST DDDEF will confirm that assumption. It's been a while since I've had 
to do z/OS maintenance, but I've learned not to take anything for granted with 
SMP/E, and especially with z/OS UNIX filesystems. 

IF you find any DDDEFs pointing to /etc or /var, they would need to be changed 
to some variation of /service as you hopefully do with your version FS. If you 
manage multiple target and distribution pairs, I highly recommend using 
automount to ensure SMP/E mounts the matching version root FS for the target 
zone and SYSRES. A colleague (who frequents this list), set this up at a prior 
shop of ours. It was not trivial. He had a ServiceLink Q&A open with IBM for 
weeks, and there was much discussion among the team and extensive testing. 
However, once the various maps were defined (we had to support multiple 
versions of languages as well), the DDDEFs were updated, and we modified our 
cloning process to keep up, everything worked flawlessly. 

IJS, I would not take the lack of errors as a golden stamp of approval. We were 
burned badly by this assumption - our SYSRES and version FS (and SMP/E) got out 
of sync, and we had no obvious indication. If memory serves, we had to dig 
through the SMP/E LOG (the job SYSOUT was probably long gone) to find that 
SMP/E had done exactly what it was told to do: apply UNIX elements to the wrong 
path/filesystem. 

Art 


---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN 
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** 

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails** 

This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. 


---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to