Less joy than I thought. The call to BPXMTEXT takes about .4 to .5 seconds elapsed on a lightly-loaded z114, and circumstantial evidence would seem to indicate that a lot of that is CPU time. Yow!
(Just tried BPXMTEXT from ISPF SD.DA and I can see that every call is about .04 CPU seconds. That's a lot!) I just did a real hack job on calling BPX1PCT instead and the elapsed time appears to be about .001 to .008 seconds, so that is the path I am going to pursue. BPX1PCT is working but I still have some loose ends to resolve. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 4:45 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: How call BPXMTEXT from Posix STC So ... if bpxmtext works we have XXX0028E Return code 140 received for 10.2.40.149 from TCP/IP function send(), EDC5140I Broken pipe. XXX0132I z/OS errno2() value X'76697242'. TCPIP JRConnTCBNotFound: A TCB was not found for the specified ... +socket. Action: Use a valid socket descriptor. XXX0112E Server 10.2.40.149 disconnected due to TCP/IP error XXX0028E Return code 1127 received for 10.2.40.149 from TCP/IP function connect(), EDC8127I Connection timed out. XXX0132I z/OS errno2() value X'74940000'. TCPIP JROK: The return code value describes the error Action: ... +Refer to the return code for information on the error. And if it fails (forced failure with bpxmfoo) we have XXX0028E Return code 140 received for 10.2.40.149 from TCP/IP function send(), EDC5140I Broken pipe. XXX0132I z/OS errno2() value X'76697242'. Look up using 'TSO BPXMTEXT 76697242'. QED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
