Tony, I used Rexx because it was easy and quick, especially when your short handed manpower wise because of bad decision making or money.
Scott On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 1:33 PM scott Ford <idfli...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am speaking in terms of development cycle. > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 1:32 PM scott Ford <idfli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> David and Zman, >> >> Both good points, C is certainly faster than Assembler or maybe PL/S >> >> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 2:17 AM David Crayford <dcrayf...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 12/01/2019 4:08 am, Seymour J Metz wrote: >>> > despite being used frequently for the purpose, it's really not >>> particularly suited for writing operating systems >>> >>> LOL! That's absurd! C has been ported to just about every architecture >>> worth mentioning and is well suited to low-level programming. It's also >>> incredibly >>> efficient and has a mature and well established tool chain for >>> debugging, profiling, code correctness etc. What do you consider a good >>> language for >>> writing operating systems? >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >>> >> -- >> Scott Ford >> IDMWORKS >> z/OS Development >> > -- > Scott Ford > IDMWORKS > z/OS Development > -- Scott Ford IDMWORKS z/OS Development ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
