If you drop foo. and don't set any new values for, e.g., foo.bar, then a request for N (next) will return only foo. I wouldn't expect drop foo.baz to change that.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 1:04 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SDSF API question -- why only REXX & Java? On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 16:40:47 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >> Can a program knowing none of this except that unknown members of X. >> have been manipulated discover with IRXEXCOM that: > >Yes. > How, after "... a stem is used as the target of an assignment [and] all possible compound variables whose names begin with that stem receive the new value ..." (TSO Rexx reference) and a random symbol with that stem is then dropped, does IRXEXCOM report the otherwise unidentified tail? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
