On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:16:39 +0000, Martin Packer wrote: > >Three I can think of straightway: > >1) No Linux sysproging > I'd expect, rather, the Linux sysproging to be similar, but no VM sysproging. >2) WLM workload management
>3) Proximity to the data > Classic data sets, or zFS, or DB2, or other (specify). And there remains the EBCDIC nightmare. Security/integrity concerns. Will users be able to log on to Linux with RACF credentials and access all their z/OS resources? Classic PDS serialization is cast in stone; NFS obeys ISPF's ENQ rules. >I think it’s going to be VERY interesting ts see what architectures and >operational regimes people come up with. >> On 5 Jul 2019, at 11:22, Jake Anderson wrote: >> >> Just curious about 2.4 ? >> >> Running Linux as an address space in zOS will have an advantage over the >> linux on zVM ? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
