Worse, I can't find the general description that existed way back when about 
R15-R1 being transient. If it's still there, it's not in the obvious location.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of 
Tony Harminc <t...@harminc.net>
Sent: Saturday, November 9, 2019 3:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: WTO

On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 15:07, Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
>
> I would assume that any system macro destroys R15-R1 unless the documentation 
> says otherwise. In the case of WTO, the documentation decribes the use of all 
> three registers. For that matter, the documentation mentions the use of 
> AR14-AR1.

Yes it's documented and legit, but it's a change in behaviour over the
last few z/OS releases. In IIRC z/OS 1.x, WTO did not clobber AR15,
and STORAGE OBTAIN did not change the high half of R1.

Tony H.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to