Making the CHECKPOINT bigger is not a bad idea, but I would also just verify 
you have all the needed PTFs applied to z/OS to allow a mix of z/OS 1.13 and 
z/OS 2.2 in the same JES2 MAS.

----------------------------------------------------- V=IBM P=Z/OS JES2 
MESSAGES R=V1R13 I=$HASP710 D=M
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Licensed for benefit of Money Services Inc <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                        
********************* Text Below Copyright (c) 2020, IBM *********************  
                       
 $HASP710                                                                       
                       
                                                                                
                       
 Explanation:                                                                   
                       
                                                                                
                       
 >>--THIS LEVEL OF JES2 IS-- INCOMPATIBLE WITH--reason-------------------->     
 >>                       
                                                                                
                       
 >--ONE OR MORE ACTIVE MEMBERS--MEMBER=--memname,--REASON=--reason-------->     
 >                       
                                                                                
                       
 >-- ,..., --MEMBER=--memname,--REASON=--reason--------------------------><     
 >                       
                                                                                
                       
 During initialization processing, JES2 detected active members in the MAS      
                       
 that are incompatible with the initializing member.                            
                       
                                                                                
                       
 In the message text:                                                           
                       
                                                                                
                       
 memname The name of the active member that is incompatible with the            
                       
         initializing member.                                                   
                       
                                                                                
                       
 reason  The reason that the active member is incompatible.                     
                       
                                                                                
                       
 The reason is one of the following:                                            
                       
                                                                                
                       
 MEMBER IS DOWN-LEVEL                                                           
                       
     The member is at a lower release than the initializing member.             
                       
                                                                                
                       
 MEMBER IS UP-LEVEL                                                             
                       
     The member is at a higher release than the initializing member.            
                       
                                                                                
                       
 MEMBER LEVEL IS NOT SET                                                        
                       
     The member level is not set.                                               
                       
                                                                                
                       
 System Programmer Response:  If the releases are compatible, compatibility     
                       
 PTFs may be required on either the initializing member or the members          
                       
 identified by the message. If the problem cannot be resolved, search           
                       
 problem reporting data bases for a fix for the problem. If no fix exists,      
                       
 contact the IBM Support Center.                                                
                       
                                                                                
                       
 Detecting Module:  HASPIRDA                                                    
                       
                                                                                
                       
 Routing Code: 1,2,10                                                           
                       
                                                                                
                       
 Descriptor Code: 4                                                             
                       
*********************************************************************** BOTTOM 
OF DATA ****************



Thanks..

Paul Feller
AGT Mainframe Technical Support

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
Allan Staller
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2020 11:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2 [EXTERNAL]

You will also need to redefine the Structure to correspond with the larger 
checkpoint sizes.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
Elaine Beal
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 11:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2

[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the 
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, 
which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.]

We are migrating from 1.13 to 2.2 in a MAS sysplex.
JES2 WARM start, no parm changes.
Checkpoint in z11 mode.
Of course I'm trying to get around having to define a separate JES on 2.2 LPAR 
A cold start is a possibility. Right now that's the only possible 'fix' that I 
see

When I IPL the first LPAR on 2.2 (gotten around several errors) but now seeing 
an error on the CKPT size.
Based on the message and doc I don't see any additional requirement.

$HASP537 THE CURRENT CHECKPOINT USES--532 4K RECORDS
$HASP710 this level is incompatible with one or more active members...meber is 
down-level
     I've gotten the down-level before but was able to identify the issue and 
get past it
            looking to do the same with this issue

Details below.

Thanks,
Elaine

$HASP537
JES2 issues a message during initialization to inform system programmers of the 
checkpoint size requirements for the current checkpoint configuration. If this 
is a cold start, the number is based on the parameters specified in the 
initialization deck. If this is a warm start the size is based on the current 
checkpoint configuration.

From displays below 532K is what is currently in use at around 90% free If the 
message is based on SIZE requirements (not the 532K in use) what is the issue?
       Using the same JOENUM, JOBNUM, etc.

Is there a parm that can be changed? It would be possible to update both 1.13 
LPARs and do another 2.2 IPL

Though not indicated, do I need to cold start?
     ***  There is no doc indicating that 2.2 needs additional space. even if 
it did, there is plenty.                ***
     ***   but if it does need more, I can see it expecting to be using only 
532K, same as the shared LPAR   ***
     ***  in which case would a 2.2 cold start update both 2.2 and 1.13 with 
same utilization?                     ***


$D ACTIVATE
JES2 CHECKPOINT MODE IS CURRENTLY Z11
THE CURRENT CHECKPOINT:
 -- CONTAINS 6100 BERTS AND BERT UTILIZATION IS 5
    PERCENT.
 -- CONTAINS 532 4K RECORDS.
$D CKPTSPACE

  $HASP852 CKPTSPACE
  $HASP852 CKPTSPACE  BERTNUM=6100,BERTFREE=5752,BERTWA
  $HASP852            CKPT1=(CAPACITY=7188,UNUSED=6660)
  $HASP852            CKPT2=(CAPACITY=5388,UNUSED=4860)




CF
STRUCTURE NAME(AAAMVSP_CKPT1) SIZE(3456K)
   FULLTHRESHOLD(0)
   PREFLIST(M3KENG2)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
::DISCLAIMER::
________________________________
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended 
for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. 
The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore 
not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or 
opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and 
may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any 
form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, 
distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written 
consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender 
immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for 
viruses and other defects.
________________________________

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please note:  This message originated outside your organization. Please use 
caution when opening links or attachments.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to