Isn’t the CTC between VM/VTAM and
MVS a PU4/5? It’ll burn CPU like crazy compared to doing the routing in
the 3745, but it should work. David Boyes Sine Nomine Associates From: The IBM z/VM
Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Strasser, [EMAIL PROTECTED] My SNA networking folks tell me that all our 3745s are going
away because the hardware is going out of support. We plan to use CTCs to
connect VM/VTAM to an MVS system to route RJE, and most terminal sessions are
already TN3270. But we also have a CMS application that uses AVS to talk to
an MVS application over LU 6.2., and I was told “For LU 6.2 sessions, there is no alternatives unless you
have a PU 4/5.” It frankly seems very unlikely that we are
just SOL on LU 6.2 without a 3745. What do we need to make this work? |
- LU 6.2 without a 3745? Strasser, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? David Boyes
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? Strasser, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? Alan Altmark
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? Scott Ray
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? David Boyes
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? Alan Altmark
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? Scott Ray
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? David Boyes
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? Steve Gentry
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? David Boyes
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? David Boyes