VM/VTAM doesn’t do EE, and CCL would
either a) burn CPU on the std engine side, or b) burn CPU on an IFL, which we
don’t know if he has (and is still $125K). In either case (a or b), those
CPU cycles are pretty pricy. As Alan said, native APPN would also be an
option, and VM/VTAM does do that. Using that, you could offload the routing
function (and thus the extra CPU consumption) to an outboard router box, but
adding a completely new protocol, router software load (to support SNA
protocols), and routing infrastructure seems kind of overkill for one link. David Boyes Sine Nomine Associates From: The IBM z/VM
Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Ray Have you check into Enterprise Extender or
CCL (Communications Controller for Linux) emulated 3745 |
- LU 6.2 without a 3745? Strasser, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? David Boyes
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? Strasser, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? Alan Altmark
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? Scott Ray
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? David Boyes
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? Alan Altmark
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? Scott Ray
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? David Boyes
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? Steve Gentry
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? David Boyes
- Re: LU 6.2 without a 3745? David Boyes