Here, the security folks would require us to edit any dump, removing any 
sensitive information, that is to be seen by an outsider if user storage were 
to be included. We would also have to encrypt any unedited dump that is stored 
on dasd or tape. Not to mention that 56GB dumps are larger than we would ever 
want to store for very long, anyway :-)

Regards,
Richard Schuh


> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Stracka, James (GTI)
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 12:15 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: z/VM 5.2 Dumps
> 
> 
> Yes, but why and why not allow ALL.  We have been running for 
> years with
> ALL.  It should have been allowed to be upward compatible.
> 
> SET DUMP,
> 
>                                  .-CP--.  .-IPL---.
> >>--Set--DUMP--.-.-DASD-------.--+-----+--+-------+--.--------
> -.--.----.
> -.--><
>                | | <--------< |  '-ALL-'  '-NOIPL-'  
> '-NOPRINT-'  '-XF-'
> |
>                | '----rdev----'
> |
>  
> '-OFF-----------------------------------------------------'
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 3:12 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: z/VM 5.2 Dumps
> 
> 
> The default is CP, there is no longer an ALL:
> 
>                                   .-CP-.  .-IPL---.
> 
>  
> >>--Set--DUMP--.-.-DASD-------.--'----'--+-------+--.----.-.--
> ----------
> ----><   
>                 | | <--------< |          '-NOIPL-'  '-XF-' |
> 
>                 | '----rdev----'                            |
> 
>                 '-OFF---------------------------------------'
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Richard Schuh
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Behalf Of Stracka, James (GTI)
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 12:05 PM
> > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> > Subject: Re: z/VM 5.2 Dumps
> > 
> > 
> > It appears IBM changed the SET DUMP command by removing the
> > ALL option.
> > 
> > SET DUMP aeb9 ALL IPL
> > HCPDMR003E Invalid option - ALL
> > 
> > Must now be:
> > 
> > SET DUMP aeb9 cp  IPL
> > DASD AEB9 dump unit CP IPL pages 52052
> > 
> > Why did IBM remove the ALL option in 5.2?
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of David Boyes
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 2:50 PM
> > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> > Subject: Re: z/VM 5.2 Dumps
> > 
> > 
> > Most obvious reason is that 5.2 now dumps more than 2G. 4.4
> > only dumped
> > the 1st 2G regardless of how much real storage was there. 
> > 
> > David Boyes
> > Sine Nomine Associates
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On
> > Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 2:31 PM
> > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> > Subject: z/VM 5.2 Dumps
> > 
> > IIRC, there was a discussion, either at SHARE or in this forum,  in
> which
> > it was stated that dumps of z/VM 5.2 would not be
> significantly larger
> 
> > than those from what were then the current systems (mine was 4.4).
> Would
> > somebody like to recant? Our dumps are much, much larger.
> When I used
> > VMARC to compress a 5.2 dump, it is reduced to approximately 18% of
> its
> > former size. That compressed dump is larger than the uncompressed
> dumps I
> > used to get from 4.4. Same h/w, same everything except for VM CP.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Richard Schuh
> > 
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please
> notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, 
> print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here 
> for important additional terms relating to this e-mail.     
http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------

If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, 
delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or 
redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this 
e-mail.     http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
--------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to