That is kind of what I was hoping for, but I don't think that would
work, at least if I'm only trying to change the newer systems.
Perhaps I'm just too frighten to make a "simple" change that will
affect 1,000 or so users, without testing. That is why I would perfer
to make a change only on the newer systems.
But if I make a change on all other systems to select a non-EDS logmode
and then change the VM/VTAM books to be EDS devices, I should get what I
want. I'm trying to keep from modifying the old systems.
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/10/2006 11:17 AM >>>
Hello Tom,
Very interesting problem. Are you planning on adjusting the
base model you are using for your autoinstalled terminals?
Each CICS has a grplist that would have the terminal
definitions
required for that CICS.
Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-588-4723
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ext. 40441
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Tom Duerbusch
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 12:10 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: VTAM Cross Domain problem/question
>
> What I want to be able to do is, on a CICS by CICS basis, setup
whether
> that system can handle EDS. My understanding of the negoiation of
the
> bind, is when there are conflicts, they step down to the lowest
common
> attributes. I would rather not make changes to our current
production
> systems, but rather to the systems that need EDS. But I think those
two
> conditions are in direct conflict with each other.
>
> What are some good ways of making this type of change?
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom Duerbusch
> THD Consulting
