"CMS-based servers in XC mode" The word "server" above can still lead to confusion: there is no reason to give any CMS user anything else than MACHINE XC.
We never had any problem since we defined all virtual machines as XC. One exception: when running a secondlevel VM, you need MACHINE ESA (or its synonym XA), with MACHINE XC, CP loads a disabled wait. (Guests like Linux, VSE, z/OS all need MACHINE ESA too; with MACHINE XC, you can't start paging. The GLOBALOPTS (or is it GLOBALDEFS) directory entry can establish the default MACHINE The change to XC machines was one reason why I wrote DIRFLAT (part of DRM on VM's download lib): it transforms the CP directory into a single line per user (resolves INCLUDEd statements). Then an ALL command in XEDIT will be easy to find users that still have their one MACHINE statement 2007/6/15, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi, James. Yes, as a general rule, I suggest to all of my z/VM clients that they run their CMS-based servers in XC mode..... Have a good weekend. Stracka, James (GTI) wrote: > While I thought having the SFS SVM itself XC, you are saying general CMS > users should be XC too?
-- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support
