No, SFS will not do concurrent I/O to minidisks located on a single volume. SFS knows on which volules its minidisks are located and acts accordingly. If I remember well, I displayed some minidisk usage in my first append for this subject, where one can see that SFS leaves mindisks unused. Have a look at the description of y SFSULIST package: http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/descript.cgi?SFSULIST I discuss the subject a little bit and show an example of minidisk usage, read the section from "the Q FILEPOOL MINIDISK command" on.
2007/6/21, O'Brien, Dennis L <Dennis.L.O'[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Steve, I know an SFS server won't do multiple I/O's to the same minidisk. My question is whether it will do concurrent I/O's to different minidisks on the same volume. If it will, there might be some benefit to putting two or three minidisks on one volume and using PAV. If not, I'll just put one minidisk on each volume, or put minidisks from different SFS servers on a volume. Dennis O'Brien "I don't have a girlfriend. I just know a girl who would get really mad if she heard me say that". -- Mitch Hedberg ------------------------------ *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Steve Wilkins *Sent:* Thursday, June 21, 2007 06:58 *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU *Subject:* Re: [IBMVM] PAV and SFS PAVs will not benefit SFS. An SFS server (1 entity) can't be setup to do multiple I/Os to the same minidisk. Therefore, the VM I/O dispatcher doesn't have anything (ie. multiple I/Os) to spread out over the real system attached Aliases. Regards, Steve. Steve Wilkins IBM z/VM Development [image: Inactive hide details for Marcy Cortes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]Marcy Cortes < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> *Marcy Cortes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System < IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> 06/21/2007 12:10 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System < IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: PAV and SFS It depends! I think you have to study your perf data and decide where your i/o contention is. We don't have it like we used to (pre IBM DS8000 and FICON ) --- have moved on to just CPU and memory issues :) We've moved most of our disks to mod 9 (all of prod Linux and about 1/2 the traditional CMS users) and the last 3 TB that went in I had them do mod 27 (makes creating large linux filesystems easier). Not using PAV anywhere. We just don't see the i/o queue that would warrant the effort. On the dev/test system with 100 linux virtual servers and not enough memory (24G real), we have about 50 mod 3's for paging. I don't suspect moving that to 16 mod 9's would be that much different. 16 is still pretty spread out. Now, if I had 3 page vols, I woudn't dream of putting them on 1 mod 9 :) It is a bit confusing for the perf guys though ---- since disk size does not show up in the perf data!!! And, I understood SFS to work like Kris said. We have both 3s and 9s in our SFS - we always give it the whole vol (minus cyl 0 of course ). Marcy Cortes "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation." -----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU<IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>] On Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 6:32 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: [IBMVM] PAV and SFS Our DASD people have asked if they can replace our 3390-3 size DASD volumes with 3390-9's. My tentative answer is that most of the volumes that contain minidisks can be moved, if the new DASD has PAV. CP areas such as paging should remain on 3390-3. Our SFS servers have 3338-cylinder minidisks, one per volume. My initial thought is that I could put 3 of them on a 3390-9 with two PAV aliases, and the SFS server could do one I/O to each minidisk at the same time, just like it can when the minidisks are on separate volumes. In the recent "dasd 3390 -27" thread, Kris Buelens said, "For SFS though (and probably DB2) PAV is maybe of limited help: a given SFS server will start only one I/O to all its minidisks on the same disk." Is that really true? Does an SFS server look at the real devices or volsers that its minidisks are on, and only start an I/O to one minidisk on a volume at a time? Dennis O'Brien The three R's of Windows problem resolution: Retry, Reboot, Reinstall.
-- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support