And there is no VMSTAT in the Download Library :-( That sounds like
something that could be useful.

 

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

________________________________

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 10:45 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: OPERATOR Consoles

 

It's not a product, it is named VMSTAT.

2007/8/30, Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

That sounds nice. What is the name of your product? :-) 

 

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

________________________________

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 11:48 PM


To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: OPERATOR Consoles

 

My customer has 18 VM systems...
A problem with managing many VM systems is that operators need to see
that there is a problem.  Problems can go away automatically too (e.g. a
queue on a RSCS link).  We had a central VM:OPER console where problems
got listed as HOLDMSG, and these messages can be removed when the
automation procedures detect the problem is gone, so problems need a
unique identifier.  The standard HOLDMSG procedure is not good enough
for this, so we started an extra VM:OPER process that grabs our own
HOLDMSG/REMOVEMSG messages. 
But, even then it was not perfect yet.  So, I wrote a CMS/GUI
application with a screen where all important problems are displayed, VM
systems can get green/yellow/red state, depending on the worst message
for that system.  It is an RxServer based server that collects the
messages and maintains the system states; the CMS/GUI is only the nice
front-end.  Each message there has a severity and a key too, plus timing
information.  The key allows processes to set and remove the problem
state (hence remove the message when the problem is gone), the timing
info (when present) can make that the message goes automatically away
after that many minutes (eg if you measure an RSCS queue every 5
minutes, you code "6 minutes" as timing info; the key could be
"linkeid%QUEUE": our server then knows that it will remove the problem
with that key if after 6 minutes there is no new message arrived for
"linkid%QUEUE" 
To the key, operator help information can be linked so that with a
double mouse click the operator can see what he has to do to fix the
problem.  More information as well as the code can be sent.

2007/8/29, Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >:

Thanks, Mike. I had not seen your previous post before I responded to
Bob.

 

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

________________________________

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 2:30 PM


To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: OPERATOR Consoles

 

Yep, again.  See "Chapter 10".

Mike Walter

________________________________

 ----- Original Message -----
  From: "Schuh, Richard" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 08/29/2007 04:30 PM
  To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
  Subject: Re: OPERATOR Consoles

 

I was thinking more along the lines of operating all systems from one
terminal.

 

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

________________________________

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob Bates
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 2:28 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: OPERATOR Consoles

 

Sure. If you can logon to the system, VM:Operator can have a console
there. The OPERATOR id can be anywhere. Authorized users can be defined
to logon and run VMYIAMOP to get a copy of the console. The definition
of the user within VM:Operator says what screens the user can see and
what commands if any they can execute. 

 

Bob Bates 
Enterprise Hosting Services - z/VM and z/Linux
<http://ehs.homestead.wellsfargo.com/C1/MOBS/WebPart%20Pages/zVM.aspx>  
w. (972) 753-5967 
c. (214) 907-5071 

"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein.  If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation."

 

 

 

________________________________

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 4:22 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: OPERATOR Consoles

In the not too distant future, we will possibly have VM systems
scattered almost as widely as we have datacenters. What products are
available that would allow the operations of these systems to be handled
from a single location, if such exist? For example, can VM:Operator be
used across a span of 2000 miles in the continental US? Between the US
and Japan? Are there other products that can do the job?

Regards,
Richard Schuh 

________________________________

The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents
may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately
alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including
any attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the
contents of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is
strictly prohibited. 




-- 
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support 




-- 
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support 

Reply via email to