On Friday, 11/30/2007 at 06:47 EST, Mike Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BUT... as Ross Perot said (although not directly about SFS), the devil's in the > details: when the space limit for the product being maintained is exceeded one > starts digging through very large manuals to find out how to extend the limit, > and when the filepool fills up one starts digging deeper into how to add a new > disk to the filepool (not hard, but not trivial and involves a lot of reading > with potential errors), and then there's the matter of learning how to reliably > backup and restore SFS filepools, and last but not least, there are those odd > (very powerful, but very unintuitive) SFS AUTHORIZE commands. Substitute "minidisk" for "SFS" in the above paragraph and it remains true (sans GRANT AUTH). If you're interested in the LDAP server or in new things coming down the pike, you need BFS and that means operating an SFS server. "Man does not live by minidisk alone." And what's so odd about the GRANT AUTH commands? You can grant authorization to files and directories. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
