Should they not treat all with respect? I wasn't advocating the use of MAINT, just pointing out a fallacy in a statement.
Regards, Richard Schuh > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gentry, Stephen > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 10:21 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: X Disk in SFS > > What you say is true. Respectfully, for newbies it could be > confusing seeing something with MAINT in the name. Most > newbies learn quickly that MAINT is the su and to treat > things associated with MAINT with respect. > Regards, > Steve G. > > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schuh, Richard > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 12:47 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: X Disk in SFS > > Not necessarily. You can enroll MAINT in the user file pool > as well as in VMSYS. The user file pool would not be touched > by the new releases. > If that were done, MAINT would be perfectly acceptable. > > Regards, > Richard Schuh > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gentry, Stephen > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 8:16 AM > > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > > Subject: Re: X Disk in SFS > > > > You've got some catchin' up to do. 8-) I would not use MAINT as a > > file space. Reason being, when new releases of VM come out, you'll > > have to worry about backing your stuff up and reloading it. >
