Richard -
 
The VMFTPUPD on my site is date 8/30/06 so you probably have the
latest.
 
/Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania USA for 44 years
         [EMAIL PROTECTED]         +1.724.738.2153
        "Yes, Virginia, there is a Slippery Rock"
 
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 10:15:52 -0800 Schuh, Richard said:
>Unfortunately, I am using the one that Romney sent to Fran, I think it
>was late last year. I guess I will get Fran's version and see if it has
>been updated with fixes not in the version that I have.
>
>Thanks,
>Richard Schuh
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dale R. Smith
>> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 6:40 PM
>> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
>> Subject: Re: VMFTP Question/Problem
>>
>> Richard, Mark Wheeler posted a fix to VMFTP for this problem
>> several year= s ago. Here is the link to the fix for VMFTP:
>> http://listserv.uark.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0007&L=vmesa-l&;> P=R7638
>>
>> Or even better, go to Fran Hensler's download page and
>> download VMFTPUPD >
>> VMARC which has this fix and several more included.  Fran's
>> page is at:
>> http://zvm.sru.edu/~download
>>
>> --
>> Dale R. Smith
>>
>> "In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular."
>> - Laurence J. Peter
>>
>> On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:33:03 -0800, Schuh, Richard
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote> :
>>
>> >We have a fairly straight-forward VMFTP macro that copies
>> files from an
>> >SFS subdirectory into a MVS PDS, each filename becoming the member
>> >name.>
>> >The return code from the put seems very odd. The return codes we
>> >observe>
>> >from successful puts are as follows:
>> >
>> >*   If the byte count is greater than or equal to 1000, then rc=250
>> >*   If the byte count is less than 1000, then rc=byte count.
>> >
>> >Has anyone seen this before? Is everything working as it
>> should? If so,
>> >are all real errors indicated by a return code >= 1000? If
>> not behavin> g
>> >itself, is the problem in FTP or VMFTP?
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >Richard Schuh
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>

Reply via email to