Are you sure the process that's having the problem is using the latest version of VMFTP MODULE with the fixes applied? If it is, you might try
assembling and genning a new module. That will make sure that the fixes are applied. -- Dale R. Smith "So much of what we call management consists in making it difficult for people to work." - Peter Drucker On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 10:15:52 -0800, Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : >Unfortunately, I am using the one that Romney sent to Fran, I think it >was late last year. I guess I will get Fran's version and see if it has >been updated with fixes not in the version that I have. > >Thanks, >Richard Schuh > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dale R. Smith >> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 6:40 PM >> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU >> Subject: Re: VMFTP Question/Problem >> >> Richard, Mark Wheeler posted a fix to VMFTP for this problem >> several year= s ago. Here is the link to the fix for VMFTP: >> http://listserv.uark.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0007&L=vmesa-l&a mp;= >> P=R7638 >> >> Or even better, go to Fran Hensler's download page and >> download VMFTPUPD = >> >> VMARC which has this fix and several more included. Fran's >> page is at: >> http://zvm.sru.edu/~download >> >> -- >> Dale R. Smith >> >> "In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular." >> - Laurence J. Peter >> >> On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:33:03 -0800, Schuh, Richard >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote= >> : >> >> >We have a fairly straight-forward VMFTP macro that copies >> files from an >> >SFS subdirectory into a MVS PDS, each filename becoming the member >> >name.= >> >> >The return code from the put seems very odd. The return codes we >> >observe= >> >> >from successful puts are as follows: >> > >> >* If the byte count is greater than or equal to 1000, then rc=250 >> >* If the byte count is less than 1000, then rc=byte count. >> > >> >Has anyone seen this before? Is everything working as it >> should? If so, >> >are all real errors indicated by a return code >= 1000? If >> not behavin= >> g >> >itself, is the problem in FTP or VMFTP? >> > >> >Regards, >> >Richard Schuh >> > >> > >> > >> >======================== ========================= =======================
