Hmmm ... I don't think a ISFC link is require to enable (3rd level) RMSMASTER on the guest to talk to the 3494 ... I think it's all done through the real device cabling (whatever that may be). All (well most) of our guests are "hooked" to the host via ISFC, so I never would have noticed a failure in this case.
Les ... ? JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HOWARD MCCORKLE > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 04:14 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication > function 24, return code = 15 > > Hi Steve, > Yes - IPL'd the 2nd level (VMTEST). > Before the IPL I ran a "DFSMSRM Q LIB OPS" with no errors from VMTEST > (CMS). > The error code indicates a APPC connect error.... Not sure if > I need to > look at some connection to the first level TSAF... I'm not a > VM expert. > > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Imler, Steven J > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:06 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication > function 24, > return code = 15 > > And you LOGOFF/LOGON the VMTEST guest since you added STDEVOPT LIBRARY > CTL to its directory entry? > > JR (Steven) Imler > CA > Senior Software Engineer > Tel: +1 703 708 3479 > Fax: +1 703 708 3267 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HOWARD MCCORKLE > > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 04:01 PM > > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > > Subject: Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function > > 24, return code = 15 > > > > Yes to both > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Imler, Steven J > > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:00 PM > > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > > Subject: Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function > > 24, return code = 15 > > > > Howard, > > > > Do you have ... > > > > ---> STDEVOPT LIBRARY CTL > > > > In the directory entry of *both* the VMTEST guest directory *and* > > RMSMASTR running as a guest under VMTEST? > > > > JR (Steven) Imler > > CA > > Senior Software Engineer > > Tel: +1 703 708 3479 > > Fax: +1 703 708 3267 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Mccorkle > > > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 03:55 PM > > > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > > > Subject: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication > function 24, > > > return code = 15 > > > > > > Has anyone run into the following running a DFSMSRM > command from a > > > second= > > > > > > level z/vm? and what corrected it? > > > FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 > > > > > > Situation: > > > First level z/VM 5.2.0 runs VM:Tape and RMSMASTR > connected to a VTS. > > > 2nd level z/VM 5.2.0 just RMSMASTR connected to same VTS. > > > No problems with first level. 2nd level (VMTEST) in cms > > mode can run > > > commands okay. RMSMASTR appears to initialize (attach then > > detach tape > > > > > = > > > > > > drive without errors) in 2nd level. Is there some sort of > > virtual ctc > > > needed between the 1st and 2nd level? > > > > > > > > > > > > "Email Firewall" made the following annotations. > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------------- > > > > Warning: > > All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate > > e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by > someone other > > than the recipient. This e-mail may contain proprietary > information > > and is intended only for the use of the intended > recipient(s). If the > > > reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are > > notified that you have received this message in error and that any > > review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is > > strictly prohibited. If you have received this > > message in error, please notify the sender immediately. > > > > ============================================================== > > ================ > > > > > > > "Email Firewall" made the following annotations. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------- > > Warning: > All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the > corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and > review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may > contain proprietary information and is intended only for the > use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this > message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified > that you have received this message in error and that any > review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this > message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > message in error, please notify the sender immediately. > > ============================================================== > ================ > >
