Pretty harsh comment there Richard.

It seems he'd like to eat up the response to the Close command and
perhaps process the result.   The CP command as you wrote it displays it
on the console. The DIAG command as you wrote it also displays the
output on the console. 

How about cutting me some slack?   Many people start using PIPE's with a
simple one like mine.

____________________________
Jim Hughes
603-271-5586
"Its kind of fun to do the impossible." (Walt Disney)

________________________________

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 5:36 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Some REXX exec help needed.

 

Even cheaper,

 

say diag(8, 'SPOOL CONS CLOSE OPERATOR')

 

or

 

'CP SPOOL CONS CLOSE OPERATOR'

 

Why invoke Pipelines when there are both an internal function and a
simple command that will do the job with much less overhead (no scanner,
scheduler, etc.). This is a case of blatant misuse of Pipelines.

 

 

 

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

 

         

        
________________________________


        From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hughes, Jim
        Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 2:25 PM
        To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
        Subject: Re: Some REXX exec help needed.

        It works for me.

        On the other hand why not make life easier on yourself and PIPE
it:

         

        PIPE LITERAL CLOSE CONS OPERATOR | CP | Stem ans.  "

         

        ____________________________
        Jim Hughes
        603-271-5586
        "Its kind of fun to do the impossible." (Walt Disney)

        
________________________________


        From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
        Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 5:19 PM
        To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
        Subject: Re: Some REXX exec help needed.

         

        Yes it did as indicated below, but shouldn't this have appeared
in the reader stack as shown by keying in the following at the console?

         

        CLOSE CONS OPERATOR

        CON FILE 0227 SENT TO   OPERATOR RDR AS  0063 RECS 0017 CPY  001
T NOHOLD NOKEEP
        Ready;

        

        CP Q RDR OPERATOR

        ORIGINID FILE CLASS RECORDS  CPY HOLD USERFORM OPERFORM DEST
KEEP MSG       
        E18823   0063 T CON 00000017 001 NONE STANDARD STANDARD OFF
OFF  OFF       
        Ready;

        
        
        >>> "Hughes, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/16/2008 5:14 PM >>>

        If the console was spooled, it went to operator.

         

        CP Q RDR OPERATOR and see if a console spool file is there.

         

        ____________________________
        Jim Hughes
        603-271-5586
        "Its kind of fun to do the impossible." (Walt Disney)

        
________________________________


        From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
        Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 5:13 PM
        To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
        Subject: Re: Some REXX exec help needed.

         

        This is what shows up during execution:

         

        204 *-*   'EXECIO * CP (STRING CLOSE CONS OPERATOR'  
            >>>     "EXECIO * CP (STRING CLOSE CONS OPERATOR"
                                                             
        205 *-*   MAXLINES = QUEUED()                        
            >>>     "0"                                      

        
        
        >>> "Hughes, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/16/2008 5:09 PM >>>

        Yes.

         

        ____________________________
        Jim Hughes
        603-271-5586
        "Its kind of fun to do the impossible." (Walt Disney)

        
________________________________


        From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
        Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 5:06 PM
        To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
        Subject: Re: Some REXX exec help needed.

         

        Thanks...

         

        Is my EXECIO statement valid?
        
        >>> "Hughes, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/16/2008 5:03 PM >>>

        MAKEBUF   not MAKBUF  hence the -3.

         

        ____________________________
        Jim Hughes
        603-271-5586
        "Its kind of fun to do the impossible." (Walt Disney)

        
________________________________


        From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
        Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 5:00 PM
        To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
        Subject: Some REXX exec help needed.

         

        I have the following code in a REXX exec which if I recall
worked without any issues in a prior life.

         

        'MAKBUF'                                  
         BUFFNUM = RC                             
        'EXECIO * CP (STRING CLOSE CONS OPERATOR' 

         

        The MAKBUF is returning an RC of -3

         

        and the EXECIO statement isn't working but did in the past.

         

        I know this is crazy but all this started after I logged off and
then back on.

         

        Any ideas as how to solve this will be appreciated.

         

        Thanks.

         


_____________
LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential
and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only.
Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.
If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the
contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in
reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an
addressee, please inform the sender immediately, then delete this
message and empty from your trash.

         

         


_____________
LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential
and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only.
Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.
If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the
contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in
reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an
addressee, please inform the sender immediately, then delete this
message and empty from your trash.

         

         


_____________
LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential
and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only.
Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.
If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the
contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in
reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an
addressee, please inform the sender immediately, then delete this
message and empty from your trash.

         

         


_____________
LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential
and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only.
Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.
If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the
contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in
reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an
addressee, please inform the sender immediately, then delete this
message and empty from your trash.

         

Reply via email to