Hello,
>From my Client userid, I type SLES to bring up the
full-service server for SLES10: This is what I get:
Why is it looking for the CDs when I have a starter system implemented?
sles
NO FILES PURGED
RDR FILE 0027 SENT FROM CLIENT PUN WAS 0027 RECS 090K CPY 001 A
NOHOLD NOKEEP
RDR FILE 0028 SENT FROM CLIENT PUN WAS 0028 RECS 0001 CPY 001 A
NOHOLD NOKEEP
RDR FILE 0029 SENT FROM CLIENT PUN WAS 0029 RECS 107K CPY 001 A
NOHOLD NOKEE
Searching for info file...
*** Could not find the SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 Installation CD.
Activating manual setup program.
>>> Linuxrc v2.0.79 (Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.21-default) <<<
Please select the type of your network device.
1) OSA-2 or OSA Express
2) Hipersockets
--------------------
3) Channel To Channel (CTC)
4) ESCON
5) Inter-User Communication Vehicle (IUCV)
>
1
Please choose the CCW bus interface.
1) QDIO
2) LCS
>
1
1) QDIO
2) LCS
Please choose the physical medium.
1) Ethernet
2) Token Ring
> 1
0.0.0340 1731/01
0.0.0341 1731/01
0.0.0342 1731/01
evice address for read channel [e003]> e007
*** This is not a valid CCW address.
Please select the type of your network device.
1) OSA-2 or OSA Express
2) Hipersockets
--------------------
Why doesn't it like my E000 and/or e007 response?
When I do a q osa, this is what I see on my system:
q osa
OSA E003 ATTACHED TO TCPIP E003 DEVTYPE OSA CHPID 00 OSD
OSA E004 ATTACHED TO TCPIP E004 DEVTYPE OSA CHPID 00 OSD
OSA E005 ATTACHED TO TCPIP E005 DEVTYPE OSA CHPID 00 OSD
OSA E007 ATTACHED TO CLIENT 0340 DEVTYPE OSA CHPID 00 OSD
OSA E008 ATTACHED TO CLIENT 0341 DEVTYPE OSA CHPID 00 OSD
OSA E009 ATTACHED TO CLIENT 0342 DEVTYPE OSA CHPID 00 OSD
Any help will be appreciated,
Thanks,
Alyce
-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Boyes
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 11:39 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES10 Client
> > Do I need a secondary user defined
It's not required, but it is a good idea to have somewhere central for
all the console logs on your system to go by default, rather than have
them scattered all over the spool. If you want to silence the message,
change the CONLOG on the CONSOLE statement in the directory entry to any
valid userid on your system, or remove it if you want the console logs
to end up in CLIENT's rdr.
> > do I need both
> > CPU statements?
No. Most guests seem to feel healthier and more responsive if you have
more than one logical CPU, but it's not required or desirable in some
cases. Do note that there are some applications that don't build
properly in a UP system, so we put the extra statement in to try to
catch that.
As Rich said, it's an example. Tailor it as you see fit. 19F and the
disks you plan to use to put the Linux system on are the important bits.
The rest is "as you like it".
