Could you post output of CP Q EDEV 8000 DETAILS and the CP SET EDEV commands you run to define EDEV 8001 and the resulting HCP messages?
> -------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail, including any attachments, may be confidential, privileged or otherwise legally protected. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this e-mail in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, do not disseminate, copy or otherwise use this e-mail or its attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete the e-mail from your system. -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Lee Stewart > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 3:51 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: EDEV Strangeness > > Hi (again)... > > We're trying to define a bunch of EDEVs and finding things not as we'd > expect... > > We have a z10 running NPIV to an XIV (IBM SCSI) box. We have 4 sets of > LUNs defined - each set has 2 LUNs, a 32GB and a 10GB. There are 2 FCP > devices (each with unique virtual WWPNs) defined to each set of LUNs. > The switch zoning seems to be right. The masking on the XIV seems to be > right. > > I should point out that the LUN numbers in each set are 0001000000000000 > and 0002000000000000. > > Defining the first EDEV (8000) it works fine. When we try to add a > second EDEV (8001) it complains that it thinks that LUN 1 on the new > EDEV (different WWPN) is the same as the LUN 1 on the existing EDEV... > > Anyone else seen anything similar? > Thanks, > Lee > -- > > Lee Stewart, Senior SE > Sirius Computer Solutions > Phone: (303) 798-2954 > Fax: (720) 228-2321 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Web: www.siriuscom.com
