Brent,

cool

if you linked the 5.3 123 mdisk as 1123 then do not forget to change the 
directory statement to DIRECTORY 1123 3390 530RES
make sure you are running DIRECTXA against the USER DIRECT on the 12cc 
mdisk I would rename it myself (530user direct)
to answer your second question that is pretty much the way it is normally 
done (a return code of 5 is ok)

good luck 

Bill Munson
Brown Brothers Harriman
Sr. z/VM Systems Programmer
201-418-7588

President MVMUA
http://www2.marist.edu/~mvmua/





Brent Litster <brent.lits...@zionsbancorp.com> 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
01/06/2009 11:44 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>


To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: USER DIRECT Rewritten with Wrong Volsers






I forgot to mention that I do have the 5.3 system 123 volume in the mix 
and also I just ran DIRECTXA in (EDIT mode so I didn?t update anything.
Brent
 
Brent Litster
Zions Management Services Company
2185 South 3270 West
West Valley City  84119
(801) 844-5545
blits...@zionsbank.com

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On 
Behalf Of Bill Munson
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:35 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: USER DIRECT Rewritten with Wrong Volsers
 

Brent, 

1) You got that message because DIRECTXA was run from the saved segment on 
your 5.2 system not from the mdisk. 
2) I do not see where you linked to the 5.3 system 123 disk to write the 
directory into the DRCT area. 
3) If you did not then you just wrote your 5.3 directory over your 5.2 
directory and I hope you did not log off of MAINT 


Bill Munson
Brown Brothers Harriman
Sr. z/VM Systems Programmer
201-418-7588

President MVMUA
http://www2.marist.edu/~mvmua/




Brent Litster <brent.lits...@zionsbancorp.com> 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> 
01/06/2009 11:19 AM 


Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>



To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
cc
 
Subject
USER DIRECT Rewritten with Wrong Volsers
 


 
 




Good morning (not so good for me). Sometime ago I installed the VM:Suite 
from CA, which included VM:Director which maintains user direct, on my 
z/VM 5.2 system. I later installed z/VM 5.3 but didn?t get back to 
addressing the VM:Suite until recently.  I inadvertently ran VM:Director 
on the 5.3 system before modifying its config files resulting in user 
direct being rewritten  with all the USER entry MDISK statements pointing 
to the 5.2 volsers.  As a result I can?t log on to my 5.3 system.  To try 
and rewrite my 5.3 user direct I brought up my 5.2 system and attached the 
5.3 versions of 2CC as 12CC which contains the 5.3 user direct, and 19E as 
119E which contains the DIRECTXA utility. I placed 12CC and 119E before 
2CC and 19E in the access list and ran DIRECTXA (EDIT pointing to the USER 
DIRECT on 12CC.  The message I got was 
z/VM USER DIRECTORY CREATION PROGRAM ? VERSION 5 RELEASE 2.0 
My question is twofold; 
1.        Why is the 5.2 version of DIRECTXA being invoked if the 5.3 
version is first in the access list,  and 
2.        Is there an easier way to rewrite my 5.3 user direct 
Thanks, 
Brent 
  
Brent Litster 
Zions Management Services Company 
2185 South 3270 West 
West Valley City  84119 
(801) 844-5545 
blits...@zionsbank.com 
 

*************************** IMPORTANT NOTE ***************************** 
The opinions expressed in this message and/or any attachments are those of 
the author and not necessarily those of Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., its 
subsidiaries and affiliates BBH. There is no guarantee that this message 
is either private or confidential, and it may have been altered by 
unauthorized sources without your or our knowledge. Nothing in the message 
is capable or intended to create any legally binding obligations on either 
party and it is not intended to provide legal advice. BBH accepts no 
responsibility for loss or damage from its use, including damage from 
virus. *******************************************************************


*************************** IMPORTANT
NOTE***************************** The opinions expressed in this
message and/or any attachments are those of the author and not
necessarily those of Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., its
subsidiaries and affiliates ("BBH"). There is no guarantee that
this message is either private or confidential, and it may have
been altered by unauthorized sources without your or our knowledge.
Nothing in the message is capable or intended to create any legally
binding obligations on either party and it is not intended to
provide legal advice. BBH accepts no responsibility for loss or
damage from its use, including damage from virus.
************************************************************************

Reply via email to